The Compound Report is an educational resource. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice or encourages personal use of any compound. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider.

Educational reference only. Nothing on this page constitutes medical advice or encourages personal use of this compound. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before any decision involving your health.

Naltrexone / LDN

1.5–4.5 mg · 50 mg

C
Animal replicated
RouteOralFDA-approved
C
Evidence grade: Animal replicated

Effect demonstrated in multiple animal studies; human data sparse or extrapolated. Grades summarize evidence quality, not whether a compound is appropriate, legal, or risk-free.

At a glance
What it is
Low Dose Naltrexone (1.5–4.5 mg) and Standard Naltrexone (50 mg) — Same Molecule, Different Drug — Opioid Receptor Antagonist, Small Molecule, Immunomodulator.
Why people use it
Used primarily for tissue repair and healing and cognitive support.
What the evidence supports
LDN dosing requires more individualization than standard medications because (1) it is not commercially available in therapeutic doses and requires compounding, (2) the effective range is narrow, and (3) individual response varies significantly.
Key risks
LDN (1.5-4.5 mg/day) has a consistently excellent safety profile across all trials. Most commonly reported side effect: vivid dreams or sleep disturbance (typically transient, first 1-2 weeks; resolved by timing the dose in the morning rather than at night). No serious adverse events attributable to LDN reported in RCTs. No organ toxicity. No addiction liability. No withdrawal. No dependence. The safety profile is one of the most favorable of any prescription drug used for chronic conditions.
If you only read one thing

Naltrexone is simultaneously one of the most thoroughly proven drugs in addiction medicine (50 mg, FDA-approved, decades of evidence) and one of the most intriguing off-label investigations in chronic inflammatory disease (1.5-4.5 mg, not FDA-approved for these uses, growing RCT base). These are not variants of the same use — they are pharmacologically distinct applications of the same molecule at doses so different that the mechanisms change entirely. LDN's clinical evidence base is growing rapidly but remains underpowered for most indications because no commercial entity has incentive to fund Phase 3 trials for a generic drug. The absence of large trials reflects market failure in generic drug development, not necessarily the failure of the compound. The safety profile is exceptionally favorable. The evidence is real but incomplete.

Published literature
4human RCTs2human studies3animal2in vitro

Counts focus on low-dose naltrexone trials in fibromyalgia, MS, Crohn's/IBD, and chronic-pain/neuroinflammatory use; standard-dose addiction trials are FDA-approval context but not LDN-specific evidence.

Evidence reality check
Human evidence
6 human studies
4 randomized; 2 observational.
Preclinical base
5 lab signals
3 animal; 2 in-vitro/mechanistic.
Evidence snapshot
LDN dosing requires more individualization than standard medications because (1) it is not commercially available in therapeutic doses and requires compounding, (2) the effective range is narrow, and (3) individual response varies significantly.
From the chapter quick-reference block.
Properties
✓ FDA-approved✓ Human RCTNot injectable
Evidence
CAnimal replicated
Key risks
LDN (1.5-4.5 mg/day) has a consistently excellent safety profile across all trials. Most commonly reported side effect: vivid dreams or sleep disturbance (typically transient, first 1-2 weeks; resolved by timing the dose in the morning rather than at night). No serious adverse events attributable to LDN reported in RCTs. No organ toxicity. No addiction liability. No withdrawal. No dependence. The safety profile is one of the most favorable of any prescription drug used for chronic conditions.
Two Drugs, One Molecule
The most important concept in this chapter. Standard naltrexone (50 mg) and LDN (1.5-4.5 mg) are the same chemical compound used at doses so different that they produce fundamentally different pharmacological profiles. At standard dose: sustained opioid receptor blockade, used for addiction. At low dose: brief blockade, endorphin rebound, microglial modulation, anti-inflammatory — used for neuroinflammatory and autoimmune conditions. They are not related versions of the same treatment. They are different treatments that use the same molecule at different doses.
FDA-Approved Indications (50 mg)
Opioid Use Disorder (OUD): prevents opioid euphoria; used as part of MAT (medication-assisted treatment) alongside counseling. Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD): reduces alcohol craving; standard dose 50 mg/day oral. Extended-release injectable form (Vivitrol, 380 mg IM monthly): for OUD and AUD with adherence advantages. NOT approved for LDN uses: fibromyalgia, MS, Crohn's, Long COVID, ME/CFS, autoimmune conditions, general immune optimization.
LDN — Off-Label Indications (Evidence-Based)
Fibromyalgia: strongest LDN evidence; multiple RCTs; 2024 Lancet Rheumatology trial (n=100, 6 mg, DBRPCT — significant pain improvement). Multiple Sclerosis: Cree 2010 (DBRPCT, n=60 — improved quality of life, MSFCS). Crohn's Disease: Smith 2007 (open-label pilot positive); subsequent small RCTs mixed. Long COVID/ME-CFS: emerging evidence; several pilot studies positive; systematic review 2025 preliminary. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): pilot data positive. Depression: one pilot trial positive. These are all off-label uses requiring physician supervision and compounding pharmacy preparation.
The Commercial Absence Problem
Naltrexone is a generic drug. Patent-expired. No pharmaceutical company has commercial incentive to fund the Phase 2/3 trials needed to establish LDN for new FDA-approved indications — the cost of trials exceeds the revenue from a generic drug. This explains why the LDN evidence base consists mostly of small investigator-initiated trials rather than industry-funded Phase 3 programs. The absence of large trials does NOT necessarily indicate absence of efficacy. It may reflect the economics of generic drug development. This context is essential for interpreting the evidence.
Why a small molecule
Naltrexone is a small molecule, It is included in this reference because: (1) it is commonly used by the same community that uses peptides for immune optimization, longevity, autoimmune conditions, and chronic inflammation; (2) it acts on the endogenous opioid system, which overlaps with mechanisms relevant to multiple peptide compounds; (3) its inclusion provides the complete picture of the neuroinflammatory and immunomodulatory toolkit.
Simple view

Need the deep dive?

The default page keeps the decision layer visible first: summary, routes, evidence, and risks. Open the full report for mechanisms, chapter sections, citations, updates, and print/share controls.

Check interactions